Why This Ancient Civilization Vanished

The ancient Indus River Valley civilization had gridded streets, multistory homes, flush toilets, and bustling shops. It traded gold, precious stones, and bronze carts with other areas along the region’s waterways. Some people carved human figurines and others made toys of clay. Crops included wheat, barley, and cotton. Tools were made to bring water from nearby rivers for crops.

The valley is largely located in Pakistan and northwest India. It hosted one of the most advanced societies at the time, rivaling Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt. And then it disappeared.

Scientists have been looking at the environmental conditions in an attempt to explain the downfall of Harappa, one of the valley’s largest cities. Using paleoclimate data and computer models, they re-created the climate during the civilization’s existence, which was between 3000 and 1000 BC. During that time, four intense droughts dried up waterways and soils. This probably caused the Harappan residents to relocate frequently.

Harappa’s decline was partially caused by repeated, long, and intensifying rivers droughts that lasted centuries. It is thought that if there is less food and a weak government, such droughts can push a civilization over the brink. Despite the persistent droughts, this civilization lasted a long time.

Over 2,000 years, Harappan settlements became more concentrated closer to water.

Scientists determined that vigorous monsoons across the region created much wetter conditions than today. That was between 3000 and 2475 BC. But then drier conditions and increased temperatures came in. And droughts.

There were four droughts—each lasting more than 85 years—between 2425 and 1400 BC. The third drought was the worst and it peaked around 1733 BC. It lasted for 164 years and affected most of the region.

The rainfall changes meant lakes and shallow waterbodies shrank, river flow decreased, and the soil dried up. Lower rivers meant that trade boats and barges could only move at certain times. Agriculture also became tougher in areas away from waterways.

This pushed people to move, which may have contributed to the society’s decline.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/scientists-may-have-solved-why-this-ancient-advanced-civilization-vanished/ar-AA1RhqRG?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=6928fae6b3a04bd585a20b944d8846b3&ei=14

Jurassic Park Period Part 2

Paleoclimate

Climate during the Jurassic was approximately 5-10 degrees C (41-50 degrees F) hotter than present time, with atmospheric carbon dioxide likely 4 times higher. It's likely that forests grew near the poles, where they experienced warm summers and cold, sometimes snowy winters. It is unlikely there were any ice sheets, as the high summer temperatures would have prevented the accumulation of snow, although there may have been mountain glaciers. The ocean depths were likely 8 degrees C (about 46 degrees F) warmer than present, and coral reefs grew further north and south by 10 degrees of latitude There were probably large areas of desert in the lower latitudes.

The beginning of the Jurassic was probably marked by a thermal spike corresponding to the eruption of the Central Atlantic magmatic province. This was followed by the Early Jurassic cool interval between 199 and 183 million years ago. ('Cool', of course, is a relative term.) Then came a spike in global temperatures of around 4-8 degrees C (39-46 degrees F) during the eruption of the Karoo-Ferrar large igneous provinces in southern Gondwana, which lasted from 183 million years ago until 174 million years ago.

During this long temperature spike, the ocean surface temperatures likely exceeded 30°C (86°F) and all the land mass between 30°N to 30°C were likely extremely arid, with temperatures in the interior in excess of 40°C (104°F).

There was an episode of widespread oceanic anoxia that is often attributed to the eruption of the Karoo-Ferrar large igneous provinces and the associated increase of carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere. This event had significant impact on marine invertebrates, but little effect on marine reptiles. During this time, the Sichuan Basin (of southwestern China) was transformed into a giant lake, 3 times the size of Lake Superior. Seawater pH dropped to its lowest point around the middle of this event.

This was followed by a (relatively) cool period between 174 and 164 million years ago, which was followed by a warm interval between 164 and 150 million years ago. During this warm interval, the land mass interior had less severe seasonal swings than before because the expansion of the Central Atlantic and the western Indian Oceans provided new sources of moisture to moderate the temperature. The end of the Jurassic was marked by another cool interval, which began 150 million years ago and continued beyond the end of the Jurassic.

I recently saw someone on social media poo-pooing concern over the climate changing. As they put it, the climate has been changing for millions of years. And they are right, it has been. What they fail to take into consideration is that mass extinction events have been happening for millions of years, AND the climate changes of the past have not occurred as rapidly as this one. If we want to survive this climate change, we need to use the brains we have.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurassic

Mesozoic Era

 Okay, we're going to take a quick overview look at the Mesozoic Era, also known as the Age of Reptiles. It lasted from 252 to 66 million years ago. It has 3 Periods nestled within it; the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. It was characterized by dinosaurs, conifers and ferns, a hot greenhouse climate, and the tectonic break-up of Pangaea.

The Mesozoic began just after the largest well-documented mass extinction in Earth's history, and it ended with another extinction event.

During this era, the supercontinent Pangaea broke into separate landmasses that would eventually move into their current positions during the following era. There was not much mountain building during this era, but what little did occur took place around what is now known as the Arctic Ocean. In contrast, the supercontinent Pangaea gradually split into a northern continent, Laurasia, and a southern continent, Gondwana. (Seems like this name has been used before.) By the end of the era, the continents had split up and some had rejoined into their present forms, though not their present positions. Laurasia became North America and Eurasia, while Gondwana split into South America, Africa, Australia, Antarctica and the Indian subcontinent, which would eventually slam into Asia, giving rise to the Himalayas, but not during this Era.

The climate varied, alternating between warm and cool periods. Overall, the Earth was hotter than it is today. The Triassic (first) Period was generally dry and highly seasonal, especially in Pangaea's interior. Low sea levels would have exacerbated temperature extremes. Pangaea's interior probably included expansive deserts.

Sea levels began to rise during the Jurassic (second) Period, most likely caused by seafloor spreading. The sea levels could have risen as much as 656 ft (200 m) above today's sea level. This would have flooded coastal area. In addition, the breaking up of Gondwana into smaller continents created new shorelines. Temperatures continued to increase for a time, then began to stabilize. With the proximity of water, humidity also increased, and the deserts retreated.

The climate of the Cretaceous (third) Period is more widely disputed. Probably, higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could have almost eliminated the north-south temperature gradient, meaning that temperatures were about the same across the planet, about 10 degrees Centigrade higher than today.

Dinosaurs first appeared mid-way through the first period, and became the dominant terrestrial vertebrates by early in the second period, then died out at the end of the third period. Archaic birds appeared during the 2nd period (Jurassic), evolving from a branch of dinosaurs. True birds appeared in the third period. Mammals also appeared during this era, but they remained small (less than 33 lb) until the third period. Flowering plants appeared early in the third period and rapidly diversified, replacing conifers and other gymnosperms as the dominant group of plants. But we'll take a closer look at flora and fauna as we get to those periods.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesozoic

Cambrian Period

 The Cambrian Period was the first geological period of the Paleozoic Era. It lasted 55.6 million years, from 541 million years ago to 485.4 million years ago. The Cambrian is known for sites of exceptional preservation where even 'soft' parts of organisms are preserved, so our understanding of the Cambrian biology surpasses that of some later periods.

A profound change in life on Earth happened during the Cambrian Period, in that mineralized multicellular organisms became common. The rapid diversification of life-forms in this period—known as the Cambrian Explosion—produced the first representatives of all modern animals, probably from a single common ancestor.

Although life prospered in the oceans, the land is thought to have been comparatively barren. Shallow seas flanked several continents and were relatively warm. Polar ice was absent for much of the period.

Large, high-velocity rotational movement of Gondwana appears to have occurred in the early Cambrian, and may have resulted in Laurentia (North America), Baltica and Siberia being 'tossed away' and forming isolated land masses. Most continental land was clustered in the Southern Hemisphere, but was drifting north.

With a lack of sea ice, the sea level was high, which led to large areas of the continents being flooded in warm shallow seas, which were ideal for sea life. The sea levels fluctuated, suggesting there were pulses of expansion and contraction of a south polar ice cap.

The article stated that the Earth was generally cold during the early Cambrian, and then said the average temperatures were 7 degrees Celsius higher than today. That doesn't seem very cold to me.

The Cambrian flora was little different from what had existed in the previous period. Primarily, there were marine macroalgae in the seas, and that was pretty much it. There were no land plants known from the Cambrian, although biofilms and microbial mats were well developed on tidal flats and beaches 500 million years ago. There were also microbes forming microbial Earth ecosystems, comparable with modern soil crust of desserts, which contributed to soil formation.

It was once thought that trilobites were the dominant life form of the time period. But it turns out that these had a heavy armor which fossilized far more easily than the bodies of other animals, so there were plenty of trilobite fossils, even though trilobites were only a minor part of the animal diversity.

Earth suffered a mass extinction at the start of the Cambrian Period. It is thought that animals that burrowed into the sea bed, destroyed the microbial mats covering the seabed, and many organisms dependent on the mats became extinct, while other species adapted to the changed environment.

Despite the 'Explosion' at the start of this period, the later half saw a sharp drop in biodiversity. 500 million years ago, oxygen levels in the oceans dropped dramatically, while the level of poisonous hydrogen sulfide increased, producing more extinction events, making the latter half of the period surprisingly barren.

However, some organisms did venture onto land, producing trace fossils of their movements. Some of these fossil trackways suggest a large, slug-like mollusc.

Just when you thought Earth pre-history was going to get interesting, it takes one step forward and two steps back. Dry land is still pretty barren, except for an occasional slug-mollusc looking for some tasty soil microbes.

Well, we're pretty sure humans arrive on the scene eventually, so we're just going to keep slogging forward until we find us.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambrian

Paleozoic Era

 The Paleozoic Era is the earliest era of the Phanerozoic Eon. It is the longest of the Pahnerozoic eras, lasting from 541 to 251.902 million years ago. (I am left wondering why such an odd date for an ending? Why not 252 million years ago? I hope they offer an explanation.)

The Paleozoic was a dramatic time, incorporating geological, climatic and evolutionary changes. There was an explosion of variety in lifeforms, in which almost all modern families appeared. This began in the ocean, but eventually transitioned onto land. Great forests of primitive plants covered the continents, and towards the end of the Paleozoic, the first modern plants (conifers) appeared.

The Paleozoic Era also saw the largest extinction event in the history of Earth. This catastrophe was so devastating that it took life on land 30 million years into the next era to recover. Life in the sea may have recovered much faster.

During the early part of this era, the climate was probably moderate, becoming warmer as the second-greatest sea level rise of the era occurred, where the sea level was 200 meters above today's levels. Gondwana moved south until West Gondwana (Africa and South America) lay directly over the South Pole, while most of the parts that now reside in the northern hemisphere remained in the tropical zone, and China and Australia lay in a temperate zone. This warm period ended rather abruptly with a short but severe ice age that caused the second-greatest mass extinction of the Phanerozoic time. This ice age was only 30 million years long, and occurred 445 million years ago.

Sea levels dropped, of course, during the ice age, but slowly recovered over the middle of the Paleozoic. Bits and pieces of Gondwana moved northward, which created numerous new regions of warm, shallow sea floor. As plants took hold on the continental edges, oxygen level increased and carbon dioxide dropped. The far southern parts of Antarctica and West Gondwana became less barren.

Then a spike in atmospheric oxygen (while carbon dioxide plummeted) destabilized the climate and led to one or perhaps two ice ages. These were even more severe than the brief one already mentioned, but the effects on the world biota were mostly inconsequential. The oxygen and carbon dioxide level returned to more normal levels, but the assembly of Pangaea created huge inland areas that were subject to temperature extremes. The end of the era saw a huge mass extinction event.

While macroscopic plant life possibly appeared before this era began, plants mostly remained aquatic until about 420 million years ago, when they began to explore dry land. They reached a point where towering lycopsid (a type of plant that includes clubmosses, firmosses and quillworts) rainforests dominated the tropical belt of Euramerica. Climate change caused this rainforest to collapse, fragmenting this habitat and diminishing the diversity of plant life.

Nearly all of the invertebrate animal phyla appeared in great abundance at the beginning of this era. The first vertebrates were primitive fish, which lost no time in diversifying. Some fish had lung and powerful bony fins that allowed them to crawl onto land about 367.5 million years ago. Their fins evolved into legs about 390 million years ago. Amphibians were dominant for a time, until the climate change that reduced the rainforests also greatly reduced the amphibian diversity. Then reptiles prospered and increased in number and variety by the end of the era.

I'm sure we'll get even more details when we study each period of this era.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleozoic

Nimravs

I couldn’t help but look up Nimravidae; the name reminded me of ‘nimrods’, which of course have nothing to do with Nimravidae. Naturally, I didn’t know that until I looked it up.

The Nimravidae were a cat-like creature whose fossils have been found in North America and Eurasia. They are sometimes called ‘false saber-toothed cats’. They existed from about 40.4 million years ago to 7.2 million years ago, spanning some 33.2 million years.

It is thought that the ancestors of nimravids and cats diverged from a common ancestor about 50 million years ago. Nimravid diversity appears to have peaked about 28 million years ago before the family began a slow descent into extinction. This diversity was apparent in the size and shape of their teeth, as well as the size of the body. Some nimravidae were the size of modern lions, and they had various other smaller sizes down to the size of a small bobcat. Their legs and tails were proportionally shorter than those of true cats.

When nimravid first appeared, the global climate was warm and wet, but it trended cooler and drier shortly after that. This meant the lush forests were transforming to scrub and open woodland, where the nimravids flourished. North America and Asia were connected at the time, and they inhabited both. Europe was more of a cluster of islands rather than a continent at the time, but there must have been some land bridges, for the nimravids also found their way there.

Still later, the woodlands were replaced by savanna in North America and Asia, and the nimravids in those areas died out. Portions of humid forests continued in Europe for a time, but when those died out in the late Miocene, so did the rest of the nimravids.

One has to wonder if the saber-tooth tiger that Fred Flintstone put out of the house every evening was really a saber-tooth tiger or actually a nimravidae.

On second thought, there may be a tenuous connection between ‘nimrod’ and ‘nimravidae’. The dictionary tells me that ‘nimrod’ refers to a person who is good at hunting. As a carnivorous species, the nimravidae had to be good at hunting. Now I wonder if that influenced whoever named this family of creatures. Or what exactly does ‘nimravidae’ mean in whatever language they used to construct this name?

  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimravidae

https://www.britannica.com/animal/Nimravidae

Tepary Beans

When I was researching for my blog post on the Tohono O'odham people, one of the foods they relied on was the ‘white tepary bean’. With my New Year’s Resolutions in mind (#3. Eat more wisely), I thought I would research these beans to see how they compare to the more traditional beans I grew up eating. Not because I plan to add these to my diet (although I could... at least one of my sources will gladly sell me a pound or more, complete with cooking instructions), but because if I’m going to think of food between meals, I should probably make it healthy types of food and not left-over Christmas candy. Or any kind of candy.

The information on the O’odham people specified white tepary beans, but there are many varieties of tepary beans. One source even listed several wild varieties, which they will sell me a packet of 50 to grow in my own garden. Alas, Florida is not the same climate as the Sonora Desert, so I don’t think they would grow here very well. Especially with me being the unskilled gardener than I am.

Tepary beans - including the white varieties - are native to the Sonoran Desert. They were first domesticated in Northwest Mexico some 4,000 years ago. The ‘secrets’ of growing and using them were passed down from generation to generation, particularly among the O’odham people. Being a desert plant, they are tolerant of heat, drought and alkaline soil. In the last 30 years, tepary beans have spread to other arid regions worldwide.

Beans are already super foods, but tepary beans are even higher in protein (21 grams in 1/2 cup!) and fiber. Their fiber helps control cholesterol and diabetes. These small beans have a meaty, dense texture and are savory in taste. White versions are slightly sweet, while the browner versions have a more earthy taste. And even with all this fiber, tepary beans produce less gassiness than other beans like navy, pinto or kidney beans.

During the 1920’s, Tohono O’odham farmers grew 1.5 million pounds of tepary beans per year. However, during the 1930’s, increased mechanization and irrigation led to less tepary beans being grown, and by the 1950’s, teparay beans were extremely rare.

Native Seeds/SEARCH began to promote the use of tepary seeds in the 1970’s and 80’s, and today they conserve nearly 100 versions of domesticated and wild tepary beans, adapted to low and high desert environments.

Their website had pictures of different varieties, so I compared the ‘domesticated’ to the ‘wild’ types. The domesticated beans seemed very much like navy or pinto beans in shape, and each bean looked pretty much the same as all the others of that type. But the wild varieties were much more angular and looked more like pebbles, all the same color. I imagine the angular edges are from more seeds being crowded into one pod, and they squish each other trying to get as big as they can.

We can call Florida many things, but ‘desert’ is not one of them. Maybe I could try to grow them in pots in the house, but they like temperatures as high or higher than 100°F, and we have the air conditioning on long before the house gets that hot. I am NOT heat tolerant, and if the house ever got to temperatures teparies like, I would not just wilt, I would try to melt.

Guess I’ll just have to order a pound and see what they’re like.

https://www.ranchogordo.com/products/white-tepary

http://store.ramonafarms.com/White-Tepary-Beans-STOTOAH-BAVI/productinfo/BTEPWH1/

https://www.nativeseeds.org/collections/tepary-beans

https://www.nativeseeds.org/pages/tohono-oodham-white-tepary-bean

Kenorland

Not to be confused with Kennerland, a theme park (based on a toy company) I just made up when I stumbled across the name of this supercontinent.

Kenorland was one of the earliest supercontinents, having formed about 2.72 billion years ago. It accreted some cratons that already existed, but also found some new continental crust to merge with. Pieces of it would later become Laurentia (most of North America and Greenland), Baltica (todays’ Scandinavia and Baltic regions), Yilgarn (Western Australia), and Kalaharia (large portions of South America and Africa).

It is known that Kenorland sat in low latitudes until great underground magma surges started to cause tearing of the crust about 2.48 billion years ago. At about that time, Baltica straddled the equator and was connected to Laurentia (Canadian Shield), Kola and Karelia (2 pieces that have since rejoined with Baltica).

It is thought that the breakup of Kenorland may have been when the Earth shifted from tearing caused by magma plumes to the modern plate tectonics we know today. However, the discovery of an earlier continent and a supercontinent may indicate this transition occurred even earlier.

By 2.45 billion years ago, Yilgarn (Western Australia) was no longer connected to the other cratons, and Kola and Karelia cratons were also drifting away. Therefore, there was longer a supercontinent, and this was about the same time as the Huronian glaciation, which lasted up to 60 million years. Indications are that atmospheric oxygen rose from 0.1% to 1%. This increase in oxygen caused the virtual disappearance of the gas methane, which was oxidized into carbon dioxide and water.

Furthermore, the breakup of Kenorland generally increased continental rainfall, reducing the other greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide. Also, the solar output at that time was less than 85% of its current power, and all these circumstances together produced a runaway “Snowball Earth”, where average temperatures planet-wide fell to below freezing.

Wow, that’s a pretty drastic response to a supercontinent not being able to hold itself together.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenorland

Everybody’s Heard of Gondwana

Gondwana existed from about 550 million years ago until 180 million years ago. It is one of the most well known super-continents, in the sense that more people have at least heard of it, rather than individual cratons like Avalonia or Baltica.

If I’m reading the information correctly, Gondwana existed both before and after Pangaea. Before Pangaea, it came into being when several cratons stuck together, beginning about 800 million years ago with the formation of the East African Orogeny, which involved the collision of India and Madagascar with East Africa. Between 600 to 530 million years ago, this group added South America, Australia and Antarctica, in that order. Thus Gondwana was born.

Eventually, it merged with Laurasia and became Pangaea, sometime around 335 million years ago. But it wasn’t an easy relationship, you might say. Pieces of what had formerly been Gondwana kept breaking off, drifting north to join the former Laurasia section, such as bits of China and Indo-China. The western edge of Pangaea was beginning to break up while the eastern edge was trying to collect itself together.

Meanwhile, the formation of Pangaea and its mountains greatly impacted sea levels and global climate, producing glaciers and continent-wide sedimentation.

But what about Gondwana? About 175 million years ago, it had had enough and broke away. But it didn’t come out of it unscathed. Besides the bits that had already drifted to ‘the other side’, Florida, southern Georgia and Alabama stayed attached to North America.

Once it separated from its partner, Gondwana just kept falling apart. About 132 million years ago, Antarctica, Australia, India and Madagascar broke off and then broke up, going their separate ways. South America slowly broke away from Africa, starting in the south and going north, but the exact timing is uncertain. It could have started as early as 190 million years, and finally finished around 85 million years ago.

So, if you’ve been paying attention, you’ll realize that most of the cratons that formed Gondwana now inhabit the southern hemisphere. Its remnants account for about 2/3 of today’s continental area, including Africa, Antarctica, Arabia, Australia, Indian Subcontinent and South America.

If I were a paleo-geologist, I might have made more sense out of the wiki articles I consulted on this subject. The writer of these articles - particularly the one on Gondwana - seemed to think that anybody who was looking up this subject must be a student, for he/she/it kept using names and terms that I - as a lay person - did not know, leading to much confusion on my part. It seemed far more detailed than I felt I could fit into a blog, anyway, so I skipped lightly through most of it, looking for the important details without bogging down the blog.

Paleo-geology was going to be an elective of mine in college, but I didn’t get that far. Hmm, anybody got a good used textbook on the subject?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gondwana

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea

Poor Science or Poor Writing

The other day, my husband and I watched a movie we’d never heard of. The setting of the story was that Earth had been in winter for the past 300 years, and it would continue for thousands of years. The only humans that still existed lived 10 kilometers under the surface, where they used geothermal energy as their power source. They had created a race of ‘humans’ to do their work for them, including sex workers, but nobody ever indicated what type of work this ‘inferior’ race did, except for the one sex worker.

Hubby had difficulty with Arizona being covered in snow and ice, with daytime temperatures of -60° F. In the latest ice age, the glaciers never reached the sw states. To me, that said the the earth was not just in an ice age, but had entered a ‘snowball earth’ ice age, where the entire globe is frozen.

How did the ice age winter begin? The characters gave 2 theories, but didn’t know which was right. The first theory was that an asteroid had struck the earth, throwing up so much dust and debris into the atmosphere that most of the sunlight couldn’t get to the ground. The second theory was that it was a bomb that threw up all that dust and debris.

Okay, yes, a lot of dust and debris in the atmosphere can reflect enough sunlight to produce some very chilly results. Large volcanos can produce enough dust to chill the entire globe as the dust rides through the atmosphere. BUT, such dust doesn’t stay in the atmosphere for hundreds or thousands of years.

What about the asteroid that ‘killed the dinosaurs’? you may ask. Yes, that threw up a lot of dust and debris. But what killed so much of the flora and fauna was the firestorm produced by the heat released when the asteroid hit. Think of it as a huge explosion, so hot the heat wave raced around the globe, burning almost everything it touched. There may have been a long winter afterwards, but all that dust and stuff did settle out in a fairly short amount of time.

The plot was that a squad of ‘normal’ military-type humans had to go out into the world to track down a renegade ‘inferior’ made human. The squad's DNA was changed to allow them to survive in the far-below-zero temperatures, but that would only last for 48 hours. I had a little trouble accepting that, but... okay, let’s see what they do with it.

The scene that got me was right after they arrived on the surface. It had been stated that ‘all the animals’ were gone. But what they see right after they arrive on the surface was a man fishing. He had chopped a hole in the top of a small rivulet of water racing over the snow/ice, and had actually caught a fish, but seeing that he was going to be interrupted, he put the fish back.

I really couldn’t accept that. If all the animals had died, where did this fish come from? Okay, maybe they were mistaken. But at the temperatures they were talking about, I would expect that little rivulet to be frozen solid, and the fish with it.

It didn’t help that long after the main character had been on the surface for 48 hours, the main character was still chasing the renegade, with his head bare and no gloves. Frostbite was completely ignored.

It was not a good movie. If you are going to change the rules of life (daytime temperatures of -60F), then you (the writer) have to follow those new rules. And it is easy to have characters who don’t know what happened to end the civilization we (the audience) are familiar with. It’s easy for the writer, but it’s not satisfying to the audience.

The Dorset culture

Starting around 500 BC and lasting 1500 to 2000 years, the Arctic area of North America was inhabited by the Dorset, a Paleo-Eskimo culture. It is named after Cape Dorset in Nunavut in Canada, where the first evidence of it was found. It is said to have 4 phases due to differences in the technology related to hunting and tool making. Dorset artifacts include triangular end-blades, soapstone lamps, and burins, a specific type of stone tool.

The Dorset were first identified as a separate culture in 1925. They appear to have been extinct by 1500 AD at the latest, and possibly as early as 1000 AD. At some time during the 1000s, the Thule people (a pre-Innuit group) began migrating east from Alaska, and eventually spread through all the land previously inhabited by the Dorset. There is no evidence that the Inuit and the Dorset ever met. In fact, genetic studies show that the Dorset were distinct from later groups and that there is virtually no evidence of genetic or cultural interaction between the Dorset and Thule peoples.

Inuit legends say that they did encounter people they called ‘First Inhabitants’. According to these stories, the first inhabitants were taller and stronger than the Inuit, but they were afraid to interact and were easily frightened off. There is also a controversial theory of contact and trade between the Dorset and the Norse.

Some of the artifacts that indicated a culture different from the Inuit included sophisticated pieces of art. Carvings featured uniquely large hairstyles for women, and both sexes are depicted wearing hoodless parkas with large, tall collars.

Not only do scientists not know for certain what happened to the Dorset people, they aren’t sure where they came from, either. Some have suggested that they may have developed from a previous culture, perhaps the Pre-Dorset, the Saqqaq or - even less likely - from the Independence I. However, these earlier cultures all had bow and arrow technology, while the Dorsets did not. Possibly they set aside the bow and arrow as they switched from land to aquatic hunting.

Another piece of technology that the Dorset lacked was drills. There are no drill holes in Dorset artifacts. Whatever holes they created, they painstakingly carved or gouged into the artifact where it was needed. This was even true of the bone needles that are so common in Dorset sites. It is confusing, since the Pre-Dorset and the Thule had and used drills to great effect.

However little has been discovered about the Dorset people, their history is divided into 4 periods: The Early (500-1 BC), Middle (1-500 AD), and Late phases (500-1000 AD), as well as the Terminal phase from 1000 AD onward. The Terminal phase would have been closely related to the Medieval Warm Period, which began to warm the Arctic around 950 AD. Under those conditions, the sea ice became far less predictable.

The Dorset were adapted to a very cold climate, and it is thought that much of their food consisted of sea mammals that breathe through holes in the ice. A massive decline in sea ice would have forced the Dorset further north. Most agree they disappeared at some point between 1000 and 1500 AD, possibly because they could not adapt to the climate change or perhaps because they were introduced to diseases they had not known before.

I wish the article had included some type of rendition of the triangular end-blades. I have a series of stories in the works about a culture that is based on the number 3, and I keep imagining them developing 3-sided blades of all sizes, even arrow-heads. But I don’t know enough about bladed weapons to know if such a shape would be feasible. Anybody have any ideas about that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorset_culture

Cambrian Period

The Cambrian Period lasted from 541 to 485 million years ago. At the beginning of this time period, the small unicellulars that represented most life on Earth became more complex and multicellular. They also diversified quite rapidly, bringing forth the first representatives of all modern animal phyla. Indeed, there is strong evidence that all animals evolved from a single common ancestor.

Life prospered in the oceans, but the land is thought to have been relatively barren, with nothing more complex than a microbial soil crust or biofilm. A few molluscs may have emerged to browse on that biofilm, but the continents were probably dry and rocky. The global supercontinent Pannotia had just broken up during the early part of the period, and the new continents were mostly flanked by shallow seas, which were relatively warm. Polar ice was absent for much of this period.

Most land masses were clustered in the Southern Hemisphere during this period, but were drifting north. During the early portion of the Cambrian, the supercontinent of Gondwana went through some large, high-velocity rotational movements.

Trilobites (I wrote about them in an earlier post) were rampant during the Cambrian period. Possibly this was because without any sea ice, the sea level was high, which meant large areas of the continents were flooded in warm shallow seas, which is ideal for sea live. But the sea levels did fluctuate somewhat, suggesting there were ‘ice ages’, possibly meaning pulses of expansion and contraction of a south polar ice cap. Although the beginning of the period was cold, the average temperature during the Cambrian was 7° Celsius warmer than today.

Even so, trilobites were not the dominant species, as was once thought. It seemed they were, because they had hard external shells that were easy to fossilize, much easier than the thin chitinous shells of other arthropods, and so trilobite fossils were much easier to find by today’s paleontologists.

The Cambrian period is often referred to as ‘the Cambrian Explosion’, indicating a huge increase in the variety and diversity of life forms. But it seems (to me) that it might be better to think of it as ‘the Period of Great Changes’. At the start of the Cambrian, new creatures with new behaviors and lifestyles destroyed the biofilm that covered the sea floor, so all the creatures (from the previous time period) who depended on that biofilm died out.

Around 515 million years ago, the number of species dying out was larger than the number of new species coming into existence. 500 million years ago, the oceans saw a big drop in the oxygen content, and at the same time, the level of toxic hydrogen sulfide increased. Either of these events alone could produce extinctions, so imagine what happened when they came in together.

Where would hydrogen sulfide have come from? There are a few ways nature makes it, including anerobic digestion by certain biofilms in the absence of oxygen. I can’t rule that one out, but I’m somewhat more inclined to ‘blame’ volcanoes, which also produce it, probably in larger quantities and certainly can do it in oceans. Also, the heat given off by the volcano(es) would tend to drive oxygen out of the water. So, was there a series of huge volcano events 500 million years ago? I don’t know. It seems possible.

And there we have the Cambrian period in a nutshell. No fascinating dinosaurs to study, but the thought of a spinning Gondwana certainly has my attention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambrian

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_sulfide

OrganPipe Cactus fruit

I have often wondered what kind of food chain there would be in a desert that would allow people to live there. Oh, yes, I’ve heard about certain rats, rabbits, coyotes, snakes, lizards... But the fact is that as you go down the food chain to smaller and smaller creatures, eventually you have to get to plant-life. On Earth, it seems a pretty likely bet, anyway.

I am often disappointed by authors and filmmakers who forget there needs to be some kind of food chain. In my latest viewing of “Dune” - I can’t remember which version of it I was watching - it occurred to me that the people on the planet were apparently colonists, or descendents of colonists. There was much talk about the great worms, with no talk of what they ate. One assumes that there was a mouse species on the planet, but they might have come with the colonists. One assumes there are mice, because the nickname the common people adopt for Paul was the name of a species of mice who fight back. And in one scene, I saw at least 1 beautiful butterfly. Nowhere did I ever see any kind of plantlife out in the wild. So... what did the butterflies, the fierce mice, the worms and the people eat? I don’t know. I don’t remember anything like that being mentioned in the book, either. Sigh.

By comparison, Earth deserts are veritable hotbeds of life. So let’s take a look at another desert food source that I’ve heard about.

The organ-pipe cactus grows in the Sonoran Desert and Baja California. It has a very short trunk, from which dozens of stems grow, producing what one might think of as a bush. Its root system only reaches about 10 cm (4 inches) into the ground, but are sufficient for sucking up monsoon water when it occurs. Otherwise, the plant is pretty water-tight, with a water-proof skin and plenty of thorns to keep from getting eaten. An individual cactus can live 150 years, but doesn’t produce fruit until age 35. Probably because a good growing year will see it add a whopping 2.5 inches a year to its height.

In May and June, the organ-pipe cactus develops white/creamy flowers that only open at night and usually close back up by mid-morning. That doesn’t leave much time for day-time pollinators to get to it, but bats do the job just fine during the night.

Just before the rains come in July and August, the fruit ripens and splits open to reveal bright red flesh surrounding lots of seeds. Or maybe the fruit was red and the inner flesh was purple; I’ve seen it described both ways.

I didn’t find a lot of recipes for preparing organ-pipe cactus fruit. Apparently, you simply mash the fruit flesh and seeds into a sweet paste, which could be eaten as it was. Or you could dry it out to make a spreadable jelly. Another way would be to separate the seeds and place them in storage. Later, you could grind the seeds into a flour to make seed cakes. So, you could have your seed cakes and fruit jelly both!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stenocereus_thurberi

www.nps.gov/orpi/learn/nature/organ-pipe-cactus.htm

http://www.ethnoherbalist.com/southern-california-native-plants-medicinal/pitaya-fruit/

Ironwood Seeds - Sonoran Desert Delicacy

When I researched the Tohono Oodham Nation, one of the foods they foraged in the Sonoran Desert was ironwood seeds, so I decided to find out what I could about this food source.

First, about the trees. There are many trees known as ‘ironwood’, so the version found in the Sonoran Desert is often called desert ironwood. The tree itself grows extremely slowly, and can possibly live for centuries. But even after one of them dies, it might remain a landmark for millenia. This is because the heartwood is so full of toxic chemicals that decay is practically eliminated.

The seedpods grow from the middle of a stem, not the end, and each pod can hold up to a dozen or so seeds. The pictures I saw depicted a brown pod that reminded me of a cross between a green bean and a smooth-skinned peanut pod. Or possibly a vanilla bean pod. The seeds inside seemed to have a passing resemblance to peanuts, which seems fitting, since both the peanut plant and the desert ironwood are legumes.

As with other legumes, the desert ironwood enriches the surrounding soil with nitrogen, so the area immediately surrounding this tree is richer for growing plants than the soil another couple of feet away from the tree. Did the Oodham tend to cultivate their crops by planting them in close proximity to an ironwood? I don’t know, I haven’t found any information on that. But in my mind, it would make sense for them to have done so.

Now, about those seeds.

Ironwoods generally flower from late April through May and set seed pods a few weeks later, which will dry in June-July. The flowers, fresh seedpods and dried seedpods are edible.

The pink flowers can be used in or as a salad. They can also be candied for use as a dessert, but I don’t know if the Oodham did that. Good to add to my basket of knowledge as I look for means to feed an alien culture.

The seedpods are apparently beige from the start, so how do you know when to harvest them if you want them fresh? You open up one pod and look for the seeds inside to be green. If the seeds are sweet and taste slightly like a peanut, you are good to harvest. Gently pull whole pods off the tree.

However, if that seed tastes chalky, you’ve waited too long to harvest them as fresh. Go away and come back when the pods are fuzzy, dry and dark brown. The seeds inside will now be hard and brown. Don’t bother picking the pods by hand at this point; just put a tarp or blanket on the ground and gently shake free the dry pods. But don’t harvest any dry pods that land on the bare ground.

Whether you have harvested your ironwood seeds fresh or dry, they should be cleaned and processed for storage as soon as possible after picking to reduce the chances of spoilage. Now, I got some information from a website (see below) on how to do this, but the instructions as given require things I’m pretty sure the Oodham did not have in yesteryear. Things like ice water, plastic bags and a freezer. Suffice it to say that they suggest you blanche the fresh seeds, package them in bags with as little air enclosed as possible, and throw the bags in the freezer. Even the dry seeds need to be frozen for at least 2 days to avoid bug infestation.

So I’m guessing the Oodham didn’t process them that way. I’m guessing they merely cooked them using their favorite method and ate. And the next day, somebody would go and forage again. Maybe they came back with more ironwood seeds, maybe they found something else.

All good to know when I’m trying to keep somebody alive on what seems an inhospitable planet.

https://www.desertharvesters.org/native-plant-food-guides-the-desert-can-feed-you/desert-ironwood/#desert-ironwood-harvesting-basics

The Sky is Falling

If you follow me on facebook, you may have noticed that I have shared many articles on climate change and that I have started using the comment, “The Sky is Falling.”

It seemed more appropriate than saying, “The Boy Cried Wolf.” In that story, the boy is lying, only looking to introduce some excitement into his own life, without regard for the consequences.

Chicken Little, on the other hand, was telling the truth, as best he knew it. Something (a raindrop) had come down from the sky and hit him. He had never experienced anything like that before, so the logical conclusion was that something terrible was happening, the sky was falling! Chicken Little ran around the farmyard squawking his terrible news, trying to warn all the other farm critters.

Even that doesn’t exactly fit the problem of climate change. Chicken Little was very young and inexperienced. But it’s scientists who have been trying to warn the world’s population that the climate was changing far quicker than it should. They have lots of experience at studying climate and how it has changed in the past, and they have a pretty darn good idea where it’s headed.

In the past week, I have read several articles concerning the number and severity of heatwaves that have been happening around the world. Not only has the world been having more of them, not only have they broken records for daytime high temperatures, they’ve broken records for the highest low temperatures as well. That means that after a sweltering day, you don’t get much relief during the night, because the heat that has accumulated all day doesn’t dissipate fast enough.

I think Europe has already broken several summer records during a heatwave in June of this year. There’s no guarantee they won’t have another later this summer. Or this fall, or... whenever. A heatwave can happen at any time on the calendar, because it is a comparison between the present and what has been ‘normal’ previously.

The scientists don’t ‘think’ any particular place will start having a heatwave every year. But it could happen. After all, they wanted us to keep the warming of the Earth to 2°C or less. What are they saying now, that it’s officially reached a warming of 1.8°C? But in Europe, the temperatures reached +4 to +8°C over ‘normal’.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t get much done when the temperature gets to 95°F. I sure don’t want it to consistently reach 123°F. Or higher.

Maybe Chicken Little isn’t the best story for me to quote to try to get my point across, but it’s the one I can remember as the summer heat settles in. So I’ll keep squawking my warning and hope somebody is listening, because...

The sky is falling.

Trilobite, Do You Bite in Threes?

When you spend a lot of time as a child/teen/adult reading everything you can find on all those fascinating creatures that inhabited the Earth before Humans came along, you come across a lot of strange names. You aren’t sure what those names mean. You might have a rough idea what that type of creature looked like, and that’s probably about all that you know. Because, really, who cares about an extinct sea creature that looked like some crazy kind of beetle?

So I decided to see what I could find out about trilobites, see if there was something about them that would prove interesting. I headed for Wikipedia to get a smattering of layman information before I looked for more advanced info.

Wow. The first sentence in the Wikipedia article is (basicly) “Trilobites ... are a group of extinct marine arachnomorph arthropods that form the class Trilobita. Guess we’d better put on our thinking caps for this one!

Extinct = they are all dead.

Marine = lived in the sea. Or maybe lived in water.

Arachnomorph = ? Well, arachnid is a type of spider, scorpions and what have you. (Thanks, dictionary.com, but why don’t you have the entire word in your list?) Morph has more than one meaning, but the one I’m most familiar with is “to transform”.

Arthropod = an invertebrate with a segmented body, jointed limbs and usually a hard shell that can be molted (discarded) should the creature get too big for it.

So far, what we’ve got is a water creature with a segmented body, limbs with joints and a hard shell. Might have looked vaguely like a spider. What comes to mind is a lobster, but they didn’t really look like that. The most common rendition I’ve seen for a trilobite is an oval shape. The larger ‘end’ is a pretty solid ‘half moon’ shape, with a ‘tail’ that goes down the middle of the oval to the smaller ‘end’. Behind the half moon head and on either side of the tail, filling up all the rest of the oval, are lots of limbs. But other trilobites had much different shapes. Let’s go on; what more can I find?

Trilobites ranged from 1/10 of an inch to about 12 inches. I think that entire range is for adult specimen.

The last of the trilobites died about 252 million years ago. But before that, they were quite a successful species, having spread all around the world and existing for over 300 million years. Scientists believe trilobites started their long journey as much as 700 million years ago, or possibly even further back. And if you think humans have some wildly different lifestyles, you obviously have not met many trilobites. Some were aggressive, and moved over the sea bed as predators, scavengers and/or filter feeders. Others were less aggressive and swam while eating plankton. Scientists are still debating whether or not any trilobites were parasites, while one group of trilobites appear to have had a symbiotic relationship with sulfur-eating bacteria.

Trilobites are thought to have originated in what is now Siberia. But that was over half a billion years ago, and with plate tectonics, who knows where that was actually located? Well, I’m sure there are people who do know, but I don’t. I’m going to have to look it up. Look for it in a later episode.

Anyway, as I said before, the trilobites all died out. Although they seemed to excel in changing shape, habitat and food throughout their long existence, eventually there was only one family left, and when its habitat disappeared, so did they. But while they were here, there were thousands of variations of trilobite. This diversity helped them fill many niches in the cycle of life.

On the other hand, there are some very distant relatives of the trilobites still living on Earth. Think horseshoe crab and others of that ilk.

And that is all I found that I understood in this 29-page article on Wikipedia. Go ahead and read it, if you want, but I warn you, it is FULL of very long words, most of them names of genus, family and specie, but not all. The ones that aren’t are used generously, with no explanation what it refers to, and which may not be in your dictionary. Have fun!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilobite

Bring the Green!

Have you read the ‘Green New Deal resolution that’s been introduced in both houses of Congress? Nope, me neither. First, I wouldn’t have any idea where to find it. Second, if I did find it, I fear it would be written in ‘Congress-ese’, which I expect is nigh on impossible for laypeople to understand.

But I was fairly certain it did NOT say we had to get rid of cows, as one news anchor claimed.

So, when I ran across an article that attempted to explain exactly what was included in this resolution (not a bill, a resolution), I took the time to read that.

It makes great sense to me. I agree with it completely. Basically, it states that since climate change is not only real but already effecting the population of the US, costing us time, money and even heath dangers, that it is the responsibility of the administration to do everything it can to assist and encourage changes to infrastructure, social norms, and a whole host of other things to help all of us deal with those climate changes. Nowhere in it does it even mention cows.

What kind of assistance could the government provide? Where do I begin?

We started looking at installing solar panels on our roof decades ago. But at that time, they weren’t very effective and lasted about 10 years, so by the time they ‘paid for themselves’, you needed to replace them. Plus, we were in the midwest, where there were NO companies who offered solar panels or knew how to install them. We got solar panels installed on our roof within a year of moving to Florida. But we still had to take out a loan to do it, and we may never get any of the cost ‘returned’ to us by the government, because we don’t have enough income.

Here’s the first few ideas I have on how the government could ‘encourage’ this change to our infrastructure (moving our electricity needs to solar panels and/or windmills): Make arrangements for homeowners to get loans for solar panels (windmills) at a really low interest rate. Encourage (or require) power companies to start replacing their fossil-fuel-powered power plants with solar panels/windmills and batteries. Why not encourage businesses to install solar panels/windmills on their roofs? Or the side of their building? There have been some wonderful innovations in solar panels; I understand one guy even figured out how to embed solar ‘panels’ in roads, so... why aren’t we taking advantage of these things?

We’d like to get an electric car, but they aren’t any good if you plan to drive more than an hour or 2. And it’s not like you can pull into any gas station and ‘fill up’ when your battery gets low. When I first started looking at electric cars, it seemed you could drive for 4 hours, then you had to stop and ‘recharge’ for about 8 hours. Assuming you could find a place to do that. About 3 years ago, I heard that ‘high-speed recharging’ only took 45 minutes, but while the Kansas City area had nearly a dozen ‘stations’ where you could recharge, it only had 1 place where you could recharge quickly. Some of the theme parks in Florida offer recharging stations in their parking lots, but I don’t know if you pay extra to get one of those, or how long it takes there.

Why aren’t gas stations hedging their bets by installing recharging stations? Investment in solar panels/windmills, a couple large batteries and the recharging equipment could make road trips so much easier for those trying to help save the world. Motels could offer to recharge your car while you catch some zzs. Rest areas could also offer a recharge while your kids and pets are running off their pent-up energy and the family has a snack.

How many people would be buying an electric car if they knew they could get it charged up while they were out and about, rather than ONLY in their garage? Parking meters could become charging stations, so that you could fill up while you shop. Why not put solar panels and (tiny) windmills on a car, to help it go another mile or 2 down the road before you have to recharge?

There are lots of ways to help ‘encourage and assist’ efforts to save the world, and by extension, ourselves. We just need to stop thinking things like, “That isn’t how it’s done.”

What is This World Coming to? 7

And we are back to water. It seems only fitting, since the globe is mostly covered by it.

As I was looking over information on Central America, one of my hard-copy magazines - Popular Science - had an entire issue on water. Including an article on the sudden and sustained lack of water in Colombia in the northern part of South America.

The northern part of South America is also definitely in the tropics, because that area straddles the Equator, and the tropics is generally 30° north to 30° south of the equator. That’s latitude degrees, not temperature degrees.

Colombia is also quite mountainous, but that doesn’t mean their water supply is assured. The article spoke of one city sitting in the heights below a ski resort. Until recently, that resort could exist because of a glacier that sat atop the mountain. That glacier also was the source of the water used by the city.

Guess what. That glacier is gone now. Not just receding, like so many glaciers are, it is GONE.

No more skiing on that mountain, no more water for that city. Now the water officials load up what water is available into tank trucks and deliver it around the area. When the truck pulls up and stops, everybody runs for whatever they have that will hold water; pots, barrels, bottles and jars. They may go home and empty those items into their sinks or bathtub and run back to see if the truck is still there. If it is, they fill their pots, barrels and jars again.

They don’t know how long it will be before the truck arrives to deliver more water, so they have to be stingy with every drop. It is all they have for cooking and possibly a sponge bath. In the meantime, they listen for notices from the government as to when the water in their taps may be turned on for a limited time.

At one point, the author was with a woman who had stayed home from work that afternoon. The water was supposed to be turned on in the pipes for 3 hours, and she wanted to get some laundry done. But the water never came from her pipes that afternoon. No laundry got done.

Did all the women in the city stay home that afternoon, hoping to get some laundry done?

The article ended with a brief mention of another Colombian city on another mountain, also depending on the mountain-top glacier for its water supply. That glacier is visibly shrunken, smaller than anybody has ever seen it before.

Perhaps they’ll figure out another source for water. The article didn’t mention any attempts to look, to figure something out. Everybody - even the water officials - just kept saying, “The rains will come.”

What are we, ostriches? Refusing to acknowledge a problem will not make it magically go away!

This is a depressing subject, and not the type I would usually spend time on trying to spin into an entertaining novel. I suffer from chronic depression and just found an anti-depressant that actually works for me. I don’t know if I’m done researching this subject or not... my constant companion - depression - keeps telling me to stick my head in the sand and think of pretty things. But the story for the novel is beginning to take shape in my head. I think I’ll start thinking out scenes and where they would go, and speak of other things in this blog for a while. If I need to, I can still do more research.

So, next time, the subject will be... Oh, who knows? Whatever I find interesting between now and then.

What is This World Coming to? 6

Food. We all need it. We all have our favorites. But what will be available for us to eat in the coming much-warmer world?

Like the topic of ‘climate change’, this sub-topic is just as broad a question and just as difficult to sort out.

My initial belief was that the tropics would probably become pretty uninhabitable. After all, at least one city in the Middle East has already come too-d****d-close to that with a temperature of 115°F with 50% humidity. Places that are NOT deserts could be even worse. Deserts at least cool off at night, because they don’t have any cloud cover to hold the heat in. But when the humidity rises, cloudiness increases, so that heat could be held close to the ground. Also, when humidity rises, that ‘drop-dead’ temperature is lowered. At least as low as 96°F.

But the more I’ve researched, the less sure I am of that. I recently spent a few days looking at the countries in Central America, because I figured they were definitely in the ‘heavily tropical’ part of the world. The thing is, Central America is pretty mountainous, so a lot of the land is actually ‘temperate’. The low-lying jungle might not be a place people would want to live, but the highlands could still be habitable.

Crops, on the other hand, might not like the new weather patterns that could come. Even without the global temperature rising, people living in those countries right now have trouble providing food for their families year after year. The rainy season and hurricanes can produce mud slides and flooding. If that doesn’t happen, they could lose their crops because of drought, like the one they’ve been suffering through the last few years.

Anthropologists believe the Mayan civilization crashed because of a severe drought. Now that area is facing another drought, and who knows how bad it will become? None of the articles I read mentioned wild fires like we’ve had in the western states, but will there come a time when Central American starts to burn?

These were my thoughts as I studied this particular area, looking for food crops that might not survive where they have been thriving and will need to be transplanted elsewhere. I don’t have any answers on that yet. The export crops grown here might be okay, as long as they can get enough water. I’ll have to research individual crops - for instance, bananas - in order to take a guess on their prognosis.

Still more to come!

What is This World Coming to? 5

Okay, I did find something to say on this subject, from a totally unexpected source. I was watching an episode on Nova the other night. Our local channel has 2 episodes on Wednesdays, and we usually watch the first, but not the second, because that’s getting too late for my husband, who is an early bird. That night, I heard that the 2nd episode was on Neanderthals, and human evolution has always been an interest of mine, so I stayed up to watch it.

As a whole, the episode explored a lot of different information about the humans known as Neanderthals, but my interest picked up during their talk about the small colony of Neanderthals who lived in caves currently located at the base of the Rock of Gibraltar.

One question this episode was asking is, “Did Modern Humans have any part in eliminating the Neanderthals?” They didn’t have an answer to that question, in the end. Not a simple one, anyway.

Neanderthals lived in the Middle East, Western Asia and Europe for as much as 700,000 years. During all of that time, the world was in an ice age, but the Neanderthals were built for it, and apparently did not find that a hardship.

About 100,000 years ago (maybe as early as 125,000 years ago), modern humans started to populate these same areas. The cold probably made them wear more clothes than the Neanderthals. And maybe there were instances of violence between the 2 sub-species.

However, the scientists said, it was unlikely the modern humans had traveled all the way around the Mediterranean Sea and got to the Rock of Gibraltar before that particular group of Neanderthals died out. What the scientists discovered in those caves showed that the Neanderthals living there not only hunted and gathered, they ate a variety of sea life as well, from seals to clams. Today, the mouths of those caves are practically at the sea line, but during the brunt of the ice age, the water line would have been about 59 feet (18 meters) lower.

Neanderthals lived in small groups. Scientists estimate their entire population may have been about 100,000, scattered in small groups across a quarter of the world. (How big is the town you live in?) And as they studied this particular group, they realized that it died out during a long and severe drought that hit the area.

My thought? Neanderthals were suited for cold. Not so much for heat. They had a short, stocky build that would help them retain body heat. But when the world heats up, that doesn’t do you much good.

If the world were going through the gradual changes of leaving the ice age, the flora and fauna would no doubt evolve in order to survive. But the current rapid pace of warming that we are in doesn’t leave us time for that. Those who currently live in the tropics might manage by migrating north or south to the temperate zones. Those in the temperate zones might find some comfort in the polar regions, although there’s not a lot of land for them to settle on. Once Antarctica thaws, that land would be available. Would it be fertile? Who knows?

It won’t be a matter of the fit being able to survive. Those who can accept what’s happening and deal with it will have a chance to survive.

And I’m back to looking for potential food for that migrating population.