Ancient Tools Contradict Civilization Timeline

A long-standing question has stumped researchers: How did humanity come to inhabit the Islands of Southeast Asia (ISEA) such a long time ago?

The thought is that doing so would have required seafaring advancements beyond that considered likely during the Paleolithic era (Old Stone Age). But research shows that the ancient people of the Philippines and ISEA may have mastered seafaring before anyone else.

The evidence is stone tools excavated in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Timor-Leste. As far back as 40,000 years ago, there existed a technological sophistication in these ancient seafarers that rivals that of much later civilizations. The researchers say this challenges the believe that Paleolithic technical progress was centered in Africa and Europe.

Proving seafaring history is a trick endeavor. Organic wood and fiber—likely used in constructing seacraft—rarely survive in the archaeological record. But stone tools do. The most recent discovery shows traces of plant processing for the extraction of fibers. The fibers would have been used to make ropes, nets, and bindings, which are essential for building boats and open-sea fishing.

When you add in the discovery of fishing hooks, gorges (a fish book alternative), net weights, and the remains of tuna and sharks, it seems obvious a robust seafaring culture existed.

The presence of large open-sea fish at these sites indicate advanced seafaring techniques and knowledge of the time and routes of the migration of those species. There was a need for strong, well-crafted ropes and fishing lines.

The archaeologists believe these ancient seafarers made boats held together with ropes. The same rope technology would have been adapted for fishing.

Fossils and artifacts across the island proves that early humans moved across the open sea. But these scientists do not accept the theory that the prehistoric migrations were passive, that people drifted on bamboo rafts. Instead, they think the movement came from skilled navigators. They feel that direct or indirect evidence of boat-building is vital to understand human movement across island environments.

Such advanced maritime technology in prehistoric ISEA shows ingenuity. Their boat-building knowledge probably made the region a center for technological innovations tens of thousands of years ago. It would have laid the foundation for the maritime traditions that still thrive there today.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/archaeologists-found-ancient-tools-that-contradict-the-timeline-of-civilization/ar-AA1QBNgO?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=693f6c4211d9422bb32ac5d9db0e778e&ei=29

A 400,000-Year-Old Hearth

Humans may have tamed fire earlier than we thought, according to a 400,000-year-old hearth discovered in England.

Researchers found evidence of the ancient hearth, along with flint tools and bits of iron pyrite, at what used to be a woodland and pond site where Neanderthals are known to have lived or camped. It may be evidence that our ancestors knew how to strike the pyrite with flint to make sparks and start blazes.

The discovery was made at the Barnham site. It suggests human ancestors were making fire roughly 350,000 years earlier than thought. But they aren’t sure what the fire was used for. It might have been for cooking, carving tools, or sharing stories. Knowing when our ancestors learned to use fire could unlock mysteries of human evolution and behavior.

There are two theories that try to explain why the ability to make fire led to an increase in the size of the brain (over evolutionary time). One is that cooking increases calorie intake because cooked food is easier to digest. Another idea is that having a fire helped create a gathering space at night, which increased human sociality, prompting a cognitive evolution.

However, the finding does not show the start of humans making fire. It is the earliest known example of using fire that the researchers are confident about. There are earlier suggestions that our ancestors used fire in such places as South Africa, Israel, and Kenya, but those examples are not as definitive as this discovery. In archaeology, it’s difficult to know if a fire was started by nature or if humans had made it.

Did they collect it from natural sources? Carry it around and curate it? Or did they make it? The Barnham site is a compelling case that they knew how to make fire. The researchers found sediments that contain fire residue, as well as stone tools such as fire-cracked flint hand axes, and fragments of iron pyrite. Geologic analysis suggests the pyrite was extremely rare, so it was probably brought to this site to make fire.

But not all researchers are convinced. One stated that other Neanderthal sites, dated to around 50,000 years ago, featured flint tools that showed traces of having been struck by pyrite to make sparks. But not at this much older site.

Fire would have been useful for staying warm, nutrition, keeping predators away, and melting resin into glue, as well as other things.

It is important to realize that learning to make fire was not a linear process. It was a scattered process, with many different groups learning on their own. There’s also evidence that some groups of our ancestors learned to make fire and then lost the ability or stopped using fire for some reason. Some of those may have rediscovered how to make fire and possibly lost it again. It seems to be a complicated history.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/in-a-400-000-year-old-hearth-hints-of-humans-taming-fire-earlier-than-thought/ar-AA1S5WuY?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=693a2c55b82340d7890331455cdc1239&ei=24