Okay, not a lot of information on this subject. Only to be expected, I suppose, since Ur is the name given to the very first super continent, which came into being about 3.1 billion years ago. At that time, the only life on Earth was single-celled, and some of it knew how to photosynthesize. And it’s called a super continent, though it was probably smaller than modern Australia.
It qualifies as a super continent because it incorporated all or nearly all pieces of land then in existence. More recently, scientists have started calling Ur and other small ‘super’ continents by the term super-cratons. The best I can figure is that a craton is a piece of land considered too small to be a continent.
Other scientists have postulated the existence of another super-craton at about the same time, which they have called Vaalbara, but apparently, the ideas of these two early cratonic assemblages are incompatible.
About 1,300–1,071 million years ago, Ur joined the continents Nena and Atlantica to form the supercontinent Rodinia. In one proposal, Ur remained the nucleus of East Gondwana until that supercontinent broke up. But in other proposals, India and East Antarctica did not collide until Rodinia formed 1,071 Million years ago. However, during that time period, the Earth’s mantle was 200 degrees C hotter than today, making many characteristics of modern tectonics rare or non-existent. This would preclude Roger’s 3 billion years ago supercontinent of Ur.
The proposal for the super-craton Vaalbara places two cratons, Kaapvall of southern Africa and Pilbara of western Australia, next to each other based on stratigraphic similarities. In Roger’s configuration of Ur, these two cratons were placed far apart during Gondwana, which is contradicted by widespread collisional events between Australia and Africa.
Yet another possible supercraton, Zimgarn, was proposed by Smirnov in 2013. Unfortunately, I didn’t understand the paragraph dealing with it, so I’m mostly ignoring it. After all, I’m supposed to be studying Ur.
Geological similarities in parts of India (Singhbhum and Dharwar), western Australia (Kilbaran and Pilbara), and southern Africa (Kaapvall and Zimbabwe) indicate these area were close together in the Mid-Archaean Era. Ur was named for the german prefix meaning “original” by Rogers because in his proposal, it was the first continent. Other Archaean continental assemblages are considerably younger. In some reconstructions, the various pieces of Ur stayed near each other until the break-up of Gondwana.
So, was there really an Ur, as proposed by Rogers? Should it really be called Vaalbara or Zimgarn? Or something else entirely? I didn’t find any indication of where it was located, and given how long it supposedly existed, it could have drifted quite a ways from its original location, but still, I would have liked to see some of that type of information.
How many planets do you suppose are out there with only single-celled life and 1 large island? With such a small land mass, would it be worth it to colonize it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur_(continent)
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur_(supercontinent)
No comments:
Post a Comment