Last week
I took a more detailed look at Kepler-62-e, one of two Goldilocks planets
discovered recently. Today I'll give a few thoughts to its sibling,
Kepler-62-f, which is a little further from their star.
The
article said 62-f might have a climate rather like Alaska. Again, I'm going to
assume that means the temperate zone. And Alaska stretches from 51 to 71° North.
The middle, then, is 61°, and if we move that down to 45° (the midpoint between
the equator and north pole), we are moving 16°.
If you
remember from last week, Barrow AK sits at 71° North, so moving its climate 16°
south would put it at 55°. This would mean the Alaskan panhandle, northern
Ireland and the middle of Scotland/England would have 8 months of temperatures
below freezing, and its warmest month would have an average temperature of 47.
Brrr!
The
climate at the equator of this outer planet could be approximately what Earth
has at 16° north or south. Brasilia, Brazil, is at 15 3/4° south, so I looked
at its climate. The average temperature is about 69°F. The record low has been
32°F, and the record high has been 99°F.
So that
sounds intriguing, doesn't it? Nicely temperate around the middle. I'm
thinking, though, that it could be pretty snow/ice bound around the poles, and
extending about 1/3 of the way to the equator.
The
article did not offer any guesses about the ratio of water surface to land
surface, and that ratio could definitely influence the climate. We could
imagine whatever ratio we would like. If it's a pretty dry planet, there
wouldn't be enough water to moderate the temperatures, so the cold temperatures
might migrate even closer to the equator. On the other hand, with so little
water available, the 'polar caps' might be only designated by temperature, or
perhaps a dusting of snow, rather than the vast ice fields that Earth has.
It's a
nearly-blank slate, then. We have a little sense of what the climate might be
like, the rest of the details are left for us to imagine. I can work with that.
No comments:
Post a Comment